Git is recognized as one of the most popular distributed version control systems available today and is a versatile resource that, among other things, promotes cooperation and collaboration. Users can do so much with Git, and there's a plethora of tools and options available. However, the sheer scope of possibilities sometimes gets overwhelming, especially when figuring out what each tool does.

That's why we're here today. This article explores the Git pull request, and the Git merge request tools and what they are. We’ll look at GitHub pull requests, the mechanisms behind the requests, and a head-to-head pull request vs. merge request comparison.

Granted, the terminology can get confusing. For instance, what’s the difference between a Git merge pull request and a Git merge branch? But hopefully, this article will eliminate any confusion and help you get the most out of your Git experience.

Let’s start with some basic definitions.

Full Stack Java Developer Course

In Partnership with HIRIST and HackerEarthEXPLORE COURSE
Full Stack Java Developer Course

What Is a Pull Request?

Pull requests are a GitHub and Bitbucket-specific feature that offers an easy, web-based way to submit your work, alternately called “patches,” to the project. The name “pull request” comes from the idea that you’re requesting the project to “pull” changes from your fork.

You initiate a pull request when you’re ready to begin merging new changes in the code to the project’s main repository. You’re informing the rest of the project team about your intentions. This request allows the team to discuss and review the suggested changes, perhaps even adding follow-up commits, before the changes are merged with the base branch.

The Git pull command is a combination of Git merge and Git fetch, meaning that the source code will get downloaded, and if this code’s reference is indicated, all changes will be combined.

Let’s take an aside and explain Git fetch. Git fetch downloads new data from a user’s remote repository. However, this data isn’t combined with the working files. Git fetch is a great way to get an up-to-date view of everything that’s happened on a remote repository but doesn’t change anything. That’s why you can (and should) run a Git fetch frequently.

Pull requests are also called merge requests, which leads us to explain Git pull requests vs. merge requests in more detail.

What Is a Merge Request?

A merge request is simply a request from a user to merge their code from one branch to another, typically to the master branch. Like the Git pull request, the Git merge request allows the team members to discuss the suggested changes and merges, offering feedback and possibly adding new commits to make the process smoother.

Git merge requests (MR) are the foundation of the GitLab version control platform. They are called merge requests because their final action is merging the branch with the main feature branch.

Git merge combines changes into one consistent tree, just one part of what Git pull does. Remember, Git pull requests entail combining the changes into one tree and downloading the source code as well.

So, how does a Git pull request differ from a Git merge request?

FREE Java Certification Training

Learn A-Z of Java like never beforeEnroll Now
FREE Java Certification Training

The Difference Between a Pull Request vs. Merge Request

A Git pull request is essentially the same as a Git merge request. Both requests achieve the same result: merging a developer’s branch with the project’s master or main branch. Their difference lies in which site they are used; GitHub uses the Git pull request, and GitLab uses the Git merge request.

Both requests encourage collaboration among team members. Git pull and Git merge both ask the receivers to check out the suggested branch merge, and prompt them for feedback and possible commits. Consider it the web-based version of saying to a project team, "Hey guys, I've been working on this cool thing, and I want to add it to our collective work. Is everyone cool with this? If not, can you suggest any edits or tweaks? Otherwise, I plan to add my work now."

So, both pull and merge requests gather changes from other branches or forks and merge the changes with the existing code.

Remember that, in both cases, there’s a difference between the request and the command. For example, users initiate a pull request because they want to execute a Git pull command, and users submit a merge request when they want to run Git merge.

The Benefits of Pull Requests and Merge Requests

Not only are pull requests and merge requests similar, but they also both offer the same benefits to the Git developer team. Granted, users can just use a simple Git command to accomplish what a pull request or a merge request can do, and it makes sense that people would ask, “why bother?”

However, both requests have benefits that can last throughout the project’s lifecycle.

  • You get better access to resources that make the process easier: For example, the request includes a pointer to the main branch so you can distinguish and compare codes in your fix or feature branch. You also get the ability to merge feature and fix branches into your main branch. Requests also offer team members a chance to meet, discuss the fix or feature branch, and perform the pushes.
  • Pushes facilitate communication between developers: Requests let you summarize software fixes and features into easily identifiable containers (e.g., GitHub). Also, it provides a convenient centralized place for developer team members to view changes and leave comments. Thus, rather than depending on e-mail, text messages, or other communication channels, everything resides in one self-contained tool, which reduces the chances of miscommunication. After all, while someone can forget to check their e-mail, it’s hard to overlook comments tacked on to the commits.
  • You get a clear history of any changes: The team can see any changes present between the feature branch and the main branch. This advantage reduces the chance of error because team members can easily see what’s changed. Also, team discussions are recorded and saved based on chronological order.

The Mechanisms Behind Pull Request vs. Merge Request 

Git pull or merge requests work by enabling developers to make new features or kill bugs without altering the project’s main code or what the users see. Thus, developers can write and test code changes in a local environment without worrying about ruining the overall product.

Both pull and merge requests follow this basic process:

  • Create a Fork of the Main Repository and Generate a Local Clone: First, the developer creates a fork of the main repository, then clones it onto their local workspace.
  • Make the Needed Changes Locally: The developer can now resolve an issue or add a new feature by making their desired changes or additions to the code, with all the action taking place in their local environment.
  • Push All Local Changes to the Forked Repository: After the developer has finished their new code changes and tested them, they now push the changes back to the forked repository that they created at the start.
  • The Developer Makes a Pull or Merge Request. After the developer makes their pull or merge request, the main repository maintainer is notified that they need to perform a review. The maintainer then reviews the work done in the developer's local forked repository, then makes any required comments or requests for any edits that must be made for final approval. Any needed edits are sent back to the developer for additional commits, such as changes to code.
  • The Maintainer Gives Approval: If there are no further edits needed, the maintainer approves the request.
  • The Updates Are Merged with the Main Project Repository: Once the repository maintainer approves the request, the developer's new updates in the forked repository get merged with the main project repository. The product is finally updated with the developer's bug fixes or new features and can now be seen by the end-users.
Become job-ready and get complete job assistance by opting for the decade's hottest career option. Score your dream job in no time by enrolling in our Full Stack Java Developer Job Guarantee Program Today!

Do You Want to Be a Java Full-Stack Developer?  

According to the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, digital designers' and web developers' employment is expected to grow 13 percent through 2030, faster than the average of all other occupations. So if you want to either make a career change or just upskill your web developer talents to cover all programming needs from start to finish, Simplilearn has everything you need to polish up your skill set.

The Full Stack Java Developer Master’s program gives you an understanding of front-end, middleware, and back-end Java web developer technologies. This master's course provides hands-on training and phase-end and capstone projects to instruct you on building end-to-end applications, testing and deploying code, and storing data using MongoDB, among other vital skills.

Ziprecruiter shows that the typical Java full stack developer in the United States earns an annual average of $119,892. At the same time, Glassdoor reports that a similar Java full-stack developer in India makes a yearly average of ₹554,636.

So, if you’re ready to either boost your versatility as a programmer or switch careers, check out Simplilearn and see how their training and educational resources can work for you. The demand for Java full-stack developers will be strong for the foreseeable future. So why not take advantage of this rewarding, in-demand job market? Visit Simplilearn today, and start making a better professional future!

About the Author

John TerraJohn Terra

John Terra lives in Nashua, New Hampshire and has been writing freelance since 1986. Besides his volume of work in the gaming industry, he has written articles for Inc.Magazine and Computer Shopper, as well as software reviews for ZDNet. More recently, he has done extensive work as a professional blogger. His hobbies include running, gaming, and consuming craft beers. His refrigerator is Wi-Fi compliant.

View More
  • Disclaimer
  • PMP, PMI, PMBOK, CAPM, PgMP, PfMP, ACP, PBA, RMP, SP, and OPM3 are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc.
  • *According to Simplilearn survey conducted and subject to terms & conditions with Ernst & Young LLP (EY) as Process Advisors