Team Performance - Agile Team Formation: PMI ACP

Hello and welcome to Domain IV—Team Performance of the PMI-ACP Certification course offered by Simplilearn. This is the second part of this domain.

After completing this lesson, you will be able to: • Explain Agile team motivation • Differentiate between distributed and co-located teams in Agile projects • List the collaboration technology choices • Explain brainstorming and the steps to conduct brainstorming sessions • Describe velocity in projects • List the Agile tools

One of the Agile principles states, “Build the team around motivated individuals; give them the support and encouragement they need.” An Agile leader needs to motivate the team. Some of the well-known motivation theories are: • Abraham Maslow's Hierarchy of Human Needs • Motivational Factors by Boehm • Frederick Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory • David McClelland’s Achievement Motivation Theory Click each tab to know more. Abraham Maslow's ‘Hierarchy of Human Needs’ is depicted as a five level pyramid. The four lower levels represent the most fundamental needs, called ‘Deficiency needs’ or ‘D-needs.’ The fifth level is self-actualization, where people reach their full potential. Maslow indicates that the lower level needs have to be satisfied before one can move to the higher level needs. Frederick Herzberg established a theory based on the two factors, Motivators and Hygiene factors. Motivators are those factors that give immense satisfaction, arising from intrinsic conditions of the job, such as recognition, achievement, or personal growth. Examples of Motivators are challenging work, recognition, and responsibility. Hygiene factors are necessary, but do not give motivation; although the absence of these will result in dissatisfaction. Examples of Hygiene factors are status, job security, salary, fringe benefits, and work conditions. An Agile project team requires hygiene factors to establish a minimal level of team performance. Also, motivators determine if the team can achieve high performance. David McClelland's ‘Achievement Motivation’ theory is based on ‘Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs’ theory. McClelland’s theory describes three types of dominant motivators, which are Achievement, Affiliation, and Authority or Power. People with ‘Achievement’ motivators are characterized by the following traits – • A strong need to set and accomplish challenging goals. • Willing to take calculated risks to accomplish goals. • Likes to receive regular feedback on progress and achievements. • Often likes to work alone. People with ‘Affiliation’ motivators are characterized by the following traits – • They want to belong in the group. • They want to be liked, and will often go along with what the rest of the group wants to do. • They favor collaboration over competition. • They do not like high risk or uncertainty. People with ‘Power’ motivators are characterized by the following traits – • Want to control and influence others. • Like to win arguments. • Enjoy competition and winning. • Enjoy status and recognition. Barry Boehm (Refer to the pronunciation tips table) created team motivational factors from his extensive project work. He established the ‘Theory W’ of Software Project Management, which states, ‘Make Everyone a Winner.’ His theory was supported by two principles, ‘Plan the Flight and Fly the Plan’ and ‘Identify and Manage Your Risks.’ Boehm identified the following team motivators: • Achievement (possibility to achieve) • Possibility for growth • Work (challenging or stimulating work) • Recognition • Advancement • Technical supervision • Responsibility • Relationship with peers • Relationship with subordinates • Salary

Teams are important in Agile and therefore, the space where they work is important too. Team Space, also known as ‘War Room’, refers to the environment in which the team performs their everyday work. Team space also has other names such as ‘team room’, ‘project room’, or ‘delivery room’. Establishing a team space involves gathering an entire team in one room. Agile emphasizes a number of important factors to improve the effectiveness of team space that foster communication and motivation, leading to higher productivity.

Bad team spaces can lead to chaotic and unproductive team output. Often, lack of communication is cited as the single biggest cause of project failure. As depicted on the image, some signs of bad team space are: • Minimal or poor interaction among the team members • Seating arrangement by job description • Stale artifacts on the walls • Team members wearing headphones • More focus on the furniture layout than on creating team space • Lack of information radiators in the workspace • Unattractive spaces The focus should be on reducing distractions to avoid communication gaps, thereby consistently delivering the predicted outcome and value.

Co-located teams work together in the same physical location. Each team will have all the skills required. Collaboration and coordination is easier in the co-located teams. However, usually, co-located team would be independent and be able to work on its own. The image depicts a co-located team in Location A.

In Distributed teams, the team members work in geographically dispersed locations. Some of the characteristics of these teams are: • Individuals in different cities work together as one team. • Each location has people with different skills. This reduces the need to collaborate across geographies or time zones. • In case the co-located team does not have all the required skills needed for a project, distributed teams can be used to fill such gaps. • It is cost-effective to leverage distributed teams. The given images depict distributed teams across Locations A and B.

One of the myths around Agile is that it only works on co-located teams. Agile can work on both distributed and co-located teams. A co-located team is an advantage regardless of the methodology, because it makes coordination and collaboration easier. An Agile team, like any other team, can work around these difficulties and make the methodology work even on a distributed team. The differences between the co-located teams and distributed teams are listed here. In co-located teams: • The team members are seated together in a room, creating a “war room” • Issues are resolved informally in a timely manner • Incidental interaction leads to productivity • Team decides the roles to adopt based on sprint goals • They follow ‘Caves and Commons’ pattern: o Caves—For phone calls, short meetings, or for team members to concentrate o Commons—Open, shared workspaces for the team where osmotic communication occurs In distributed teams: • Teams are distributed geographically • Formal logging of knowledge occurs • Structured use of processes is ensured • Explicit role definition is done via tasks • Exploit technology for collaboration • Use live video conferencing • Use group chat Instant Messaging • When sending mail, choose the recipient, and CC the rest of the team • Have forums or corporate information hubs

Osmotic Communication refers to the information that is overheard in the background of the team room and some of it is absorbed. It is one of the benefits of having co-located team. As depicted in the image, there are no impediments that impact the flow of information across the work area. Therefore, in such environment, osmotic communication happens naturally.

Collaboration and coordination are required for a project. Collaboration is the process of bringing together the knowledge, experience, and skills of multiple team members to contribute to the development of a new product. It requires some level of coordination between the team. The act of collaboration enables the team to achieve potentially a lot more than the “sum of the parts”. Coordination is the act of sharing information among the team members. Collaboration and coordination requires some level of interaction. A few guidelines for using the interaction modes to foster greater collaboration and coordination are as follows: • Understand and make use of the various interaction modes that are available. For example, e-mail, instant messaging, video conferencing, and in-person meeting. • Match the interaction mode with collaboration practices. For example, brainstorming may require an in-person meeting, whereas a status update can be done by e-mail or conference call. • Use lower-cost interaction methods as much as possible. • Highly effective methods must be used for critical, higher-risk activities.

There are many enabling technologies for collaboration. Broadly, they may be classified as Synchronous and Asynchronous. Through synchronous technologies, all participants can view information and or meet at the same time. Examples are teleconferencing and video conferencing, web-hosted meetings, and virtual collaboration sessions. Through asynchronous technologies, all participants can view information and provide feedback at different points of time. Examples are e-mail, exchange of drawings and documents, project information and models, and workflow and groupware software.

Two scenarios are given, where the issue of communication gap is addressed. Click the respective tab to learn about scenarios in detail.Natasha Lisovskii, the ScrumMaster at Nutri Worldwide Inc., was monitoring an R&D project of developing a new Customer Relationship Management software package. Despite following the Agile methodology, the project was behind schedule. The given image shows how the team members were working in silos and communicating through e-mails and physical documents. There were hardly any face-to-face interactions or daily stand-up meetings. Most of the information sharing took place through e-mails and physical documents. ScrumMaster monitored the R&D Project. The Business Analysts extracted knowledge about requirements from customers and handed them to the developers. Developers translated the information into executable codes. Then, testers wrote verification scripts to validate the results. There were huge communication gaps at every stage of this process resulting in difference in the original request and the final delivered product. Every team member was working in silos; however, the ScrumMaster had a full view of the project. Based on the scenario, list the changes that the Agile coach of Nutri Worldwide Inc. should implement to reduce the communication gap within the team. Listed are some of the recommended changes that could be introduced to help the team overcome the issues: • Ensure daily stand-up meetings are conducted at the same time and place. • Use minimal documentation, just enough to have audit trail of the requirement, and ensure most of the finer details emerge through face-to-face communication. • Use Kanban or Task boards to track the progress of the user stories. This ensures everyone is aware of each other’s progress. It also enables individuals to take pride in the stories that they have completed. • Use Burnup and Burndown charts in the work space to show the progress of the sprint and release. This helps the team to know their progress and assess whether they are behind or ahead of schedule. • Introduce video and audio conferencing facilities to the team, if it is not co-located. This ensures the team members are well connected to each other. Tony Orlando, the Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Fairfax, was asked to report on the primary reason behind project failures. The reason cited was the contradictory goals of different stakeholders working on the same project. The given image depicts the main challenge faced by the team. The developer wants to write structured code. The Marketing, Sales, and Finance personnel want the product to succeed, while the customer demands a good user experience. There is little interaction between these stakeholders in an IT project, leading to differences in the goals of the business unit and the IT unit. Tony cited that the failure of new initiatives was due to the huge disconnect between business units, such as marketing, sales, and finance, and IT goals. It was out of these seemingly contradictory goals that the Agile development framework was born. Its principles are very important in business, today. In Agile, the focus shifts from the project to the product. Sufficient communication channels and iterations are required for the success of the organization. The given image shows the necessary communication channels and iterations.

Brainstorming session is a tool to generate ideas from a selected audience to solve a problem or stimulate creativity. It is important to create an environment that would encourage and facilitate a free flow of ideas. Brainstorming could also be used by the project teams for solving a process problem, inventing new products or product innovation, solving inter-group communication problems, improving customer service, budgeting exercises, and project scheduling.

Some of the steps to set up an effective brainstorming session are as follows. • Optimize the environment for brainstorming • Engage an experienced brainstorming facilitator • Provide background to the participants, ahead of time, so they can be prepared • Create a team with people from diverse groups • Conduct a creative warm-up activity, to lift the energy level prior to the meeting • Establish the ground rules for the session • Postpone criticism. This is very important, because criticism tends to interrupt the flow of ideas and will even block the ideas from coming forward.

There is no single prescription to make a brainstorming session successful, but the steps to conduct an effective brainstorming session are given on the screen: • Who wants to be the lead? Designate an individual to facilitate the session. This facilitator must ensure the philosophy is carried out appropriately to achieve the desired outcome of the meeting. • Ready, set, goal: The facilitator has to present a set of specific questions or goals to the group to generate ideas or feedback. • Got an idea? Share it: Each member has to write one idea per card and read it aloud to the group. Later, the card is placed in the middle of the table. • Put the puzzle together: After all the ideas are on the table, the group collectively and collaboratively arranges the cards on the table and determines the most critical ideas to pursue. It is very important that this is a group activity, and everyone gets to voice their opinion. • Solve it as a team: Now the group will form teams, which will work on the tasks to take the ideas forward after discussion. After discussion, the team will assign individual tasks, and reach a consensus on the desired course of action

An important metric used by the team in planning is “Velocity”. It helps forecast delivery timelines. Velocity is calculated by adding the number of story points assigned to each user story that the team has completed during the iteration. Key points to remember are as follows: Velocity is a reliable measure because it is based on empirical data, past observations, and not on somebody’s perception of the data. It is an observation of the team’s capacity to complete work per iteration and not an estimate or a target. Velocity is based on the team’s sizing of work items in reference to estimated time; not on the time dictated or imposed by anyone other than the team members. It is based on the team’s estimation and not the estimation done by some external entity such as customers or stakeholders. Velocity is comparable across iterations for a given team on a given project. The velocity of a team can only be compared with itself from iteration-to-iteration. The goal for the team should be to maintain a consistent velocity and not necessarily to maximize velocity. It is not comparable across teams or projects. The image on the screen depicts velocity trend across iterations, where the blue line indicates actual velocity.

If a team completes four stories in a given iteration, with story points A, B, C, and D as 5, 3, 7, and 5 respectively, calculate the velocity. Options are given on the screen, click the tabs to choose the right answer. • This is an incorrect option. • Good work! 20 is the correct option. Velocity can be calculated by adding the story points assigned to each user story. By adding the story points given here, velocity is 5+3+7+5 = 20.

If the velocity of the team is 14, identify the stories that will be earmarked for Iteration 1 and Iteration 2 during release planning? (Note: Story A has the highest priority followed by Story B and so on) Click the ‘Answer’ button to view the stories earmarked for Iterations 1 and 2. If the team knows its normal rate of velocity, it can use this information for planning the work. In this example, the team’s velocity is 14. The team can select stories to work on, in future iterations, based on the sizes of the stories. For instance, in iteration 1, the team can work on stories A, B, and C, which add up to a size of 14 (5 + 8 + 1). Another combination of stories can also be picked, such as C, D, F, and G, which adds up to a size of 14 (3 + 3 + 5 + 3). In collaboration with the product owner, the team can select the best possible combination.

Velocity measures the number of story points delivered during iteration. The unit of measure for velocity is determined during the estimation session. They are Story Points and Ideal Time. Story points are the unit of measure if the team plans to commit to user stories based on relative sizing. Ideal time is used as a unit of measure if the team plans to commit to user stories based on hours or days. Stories are the actual work items that determine the value of the story points. Ideal hours reflect the effort to implement the story points. Note the following points: • Only the completed work is counted towards velocity. • Velocity corrects estimation errors. • Velocity tracks customer satisfaction. • Velocity tracks early and continuous delivery.

The given bar chart shows a graph plotting the velocity of a team over 13 iterations. Notice that the velocity of the team varies largely between 25 and 45, with one outlier observation in iteration 1 and 7. Leaving the outliers, the average velocity of sprints is 38. Such historical data is useful for the team, as the average velocity from iterations will be used to compute the overall capacity of upcoming releases.

As Agile was started by software developers and it emphasizes on sharing, community, and high visibility, there are a large number of Agile tools available as open source products. Some of the open source Agile tools are: • Agile specific project management tools (Example: xplanner) • Continuous integration build tools (Example: Cruise Control) • Automated testing tools (Example: Junit, Fitnesse) • Agile software configuration management tools (Example: subversion)

Following is the quiz section to check your understanding of the lesson. Select the correct answer and click Submit to see the feedback.

Let us summarize the topics covered in this lesson: ? The renowned motivational theories used in Agile are: o Abraham Maslow's Hierarchy of Human Needs, o Frederick Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, o David McClelland’s Achievement Motivation Theory, and o Motivational Factors by Boehm. ? There are differences in co-located and distributed teams as well as tools and techniques that work well with both of them. ? Osmotic communication occurs when information is overheard in the background of the team room. ? Collaboration is the basis for bringing together the knowledge, experience, and skills of multiple team members to contribute to the development of a new product. It can happen synchronously or asynchronously. ? Brainstorming session is a tool to generate ideas from a selected audience to solve a problem or stimulate creativity. ? Velocity is a measure of team’s rate of progress per iteration. ? It is calculated by adding the number of story points assigned to each user story that the team has completed during the iteration. ? The unit of measure for velocity is determined by the team during the estimation session. ? The open source Agile tools available are: o Xplanner for Agile specific project management tools o Cruise Control for continuous integration build tools o Junit, Fitnesse for automated testing tools o Subversion for Agile software configuration management tools

This concludes Domain IV, Team Performance. The next domain is ‘Adaptive Planning.’

Hello and welcome to Domain IV—Team Performance of the PMI-ACP Certification course offered by Simplilearn. This is the second part of this domain.

After completing this lesson, you will be able to: • Explain Agile team motivation • Differentiate between distributed and co-located teams in Agile projects • List the collaboration technology choices • Explain brainstorming and the steps to conduct brainstorming sessions • Describe velocity in projects • List the Agile tools

One of the Agile principles states, “Build the team around motivated individuals; give them the support and encouragement they need.” An Agile leader needs to motivate the team. Some of the well-known motivation theories are: • Abraham Maslow's Hierarchy of Human Needs • Motivational Factors by Boehm • Frederick Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory • David McClelland’s Achievement Motivation Theory Click each tab to know more. Abraham Maslow's ‘Hierarchy of Human Needs’ is depicted as a five level pyramid. The four lower levels represent the most fundamental needs, called ‘Deficiency needs’ or ‘D-needs.’ The fifth level is self-actualization, where people reach their full potential. Maslow indicates that the lower level needs have to be satisfied before one can move to the higher level needs. Frederick Herzberg established a theory based on the two factors, Motivators and Hygiene factors. Motivators are those factors that give immense satisfaction, arising from intrinsic conditions of the job, such as recognition, achievement, or personal growth. Examples of Motivators are challenging work, recognition, and responsibility. Hygiene factors are necessary, but do not give motivation; although the absence of these will result in dissatisfaction. Examples of Hygiene factors are status, job security, salary, fringe benefits, and work conditions. An Agile project team requires hygiene factors to establish a minimal level of team performance. Also, motivators determine if the team can achieve high performance. David McClelland's ‘Achievement Motivation’ theory is based on ‘Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs’ theory. McClelland’s theory describes three types of dominant motivators, which are Achievement, Affiliation, and Authority or Power. People with ‘Achievement’ motivators are characterized by the following traits – • A strong need to set and accomplish challenging goals. • Willing to take calculated risks to accomplish goals. • Likes to receive regular feedback on progress and achievements. • Often likes to work alone. People with ‘Affiliation’ motivators are characterized by the following traits – • They want to belong in the group. • They want to be liked, and will often go along with what the rest of the group wants to do. • They favor collaboration over competition. • They do not like high risk or uncertainty. People with ‘Power’ motivators are characterized by the following traits – • Want to control and influence others. • Like to win arguments. • Enjoy competition and winning. • Enjoy status and recognition. Barry Boehm (Refer to the pronunciation tips table) created team motivational factors from his extensive project work. He established the ‘Theory W’ of Software Project Management, which states, ‘Make Everyone a Winner.’ His theory was supported by two principles, ‘Plan the Flight and Fly the Plan’ and ‘Identify and Manage Your Risks.’ Boehm identified the following team motivators: • Achievement (possibility to achieve) • Possibility for growth • Work (challenging or stimulating work) • Recognition • Advancement • Technical supervision • Responsibility • Relationship with peers • Relationship with subordinates • Salary

Teams are important in Agile and therefore, the space where they work is important too. Team Space, also known as ‘War Room’, refers to the environment in which the team performs their everyday work. Team space also has other names such as ‘team room’, ‘project room’, or ‘delivery room’. Establishing a team space involves gathering an entire team in one room. Agile emphasizes a number of important factors to improve the effectiveness of team space that foster communication and motivation, leading to higher productivity.

Bad team spaces can lead to chaotic and unproductive team output. Often, lack of communication is cited as the single biggest cause of project failure. As depicted on the image, some signs of bad team space are: • Minimal or poor interaction among the team members • Seating arrangement by job description • Stale artifacts on the walls • Team members wearing headphones • More focus on the furniture layout than on creating team space • Lack of information radiators in the workspace • Unattractive spaces The focus should be on reducing distractions to avoid communication gaps, thereby consistently delivering the predicted outcome and value.

Co-located teams work together in the same physical location. Each team will have all the skills required. Collaboration and coordination is easier in the co-located teams. However, usually, co-located team would be independent and be able to work on its own. The image depicts a co-located team in Location A.

In Distributed teams, the team members work in geographically dispersed locations. Some of the characteristics of these teams are: • Individuals in different cities work together as one team. • Each location has people with different skills. This reduces the need to collaborate across geographies or time zones. • In case the co-located team does not have all the required skills needed for a project, distributed teams can be used to fill such gaps. • It is cost-effective to leverage distributed teams. The given images depict distributed teams across Locations A and B.

One of the myths around Agile is that it only works on co-located teams. Agile can work on both distributed and co-located teams. A co-located team is an advantage regardless of the methodology, because it makes coordination and collaboration easier. An Agile team, like any other team, can work around these difficulties and make the methodology work even on a distributed team. The differences between the co-located teams and distributed teams are listed here. In co-located teams: • The team members are seated together in a room, creating a “war room” • Issues are resolved informally in a timely manner • Incidental interaction leads to productivity • Team decides the roles to adopt based on sprint goals • They follow ‘Caves and Commons’ pattern: o Caves—For phone calls, short meetings, or for team members to concentrate o Commons—Open, shared workspaces for the team where osmotic communication occurs In distributed teams: • Teams are distributed geographically • Formal logging of knowledge occurs • Structured use of processes is ensured • Explicit role definition is done via tasks • Exploit technology for collaboration • Use live video conferencing • Use group chat Instant Messaging • When sending mail, choose the recipient, and CC the rest of the team • Have forums or corporate information hubs

Osmotic Communication refers to the information that is overheard in the background of the team room and some of it is absorbed. It is one of the benefits of having co-located team. As depicted in the image, there are no impediments that impact the flow of information across the work area. Therefore, in such environment, osmotic communication happens naturally.

Collaboration and coordination are required for a project. Collaboration is the process of bringing together the knowledge, experience, and skills of multiple team members to contribute to the development of a new product. It requires some level of coordination between the team. The act of collaboration enables the team to achieve potentially a lot more than the “sum of the parts”. Coordination is the act of sharing information among the team members. Collaboration and coordination requires some level of interaction. A few guidelines for using the interaction modes to foster greater collaboration and coordination are as follows: • Understand and make use of the various interaction modes that are available. For example, e-mail, instant messaging, video conferencing, and in-person meeting. • Match the interaction mode with collaboration practices. For example, brainstorming may require an in-person meeting, whereas a status update can be done by e-mail or conference call. • Use lower-cost interaction methods as much as possible. • Highly effective methods must be used for critical, higher-risk activities.

There are many enabling technologies for collaboration. Broadly, they may be classified as Synchronous and Asynchronous. Through synchronous technologies, all participants can view information and or meet at the same time. Examples are teleconferencing and video conferencing, web-hosted meetings, and virtual collaboration sessions. Through asynchronous technologies, all participants can view information and provide feedback at different points of time. Examples are e-mail, exchange of drawings and documents, project information and models, and workflow and groupware software.

Two scenarios are given, where the issue of communication gap is addressed. Click the respective tab to learn about scenarios in detail.Natasha Lisovskii, the ScrumMaster at Nutri Worldwide Inc., was monitoring an R&D project of developing a new Customer Relationship Management software package. Despite following the Agile methodology, the project was behind schedule. The given image shows how the team members were working in silos and communicating through e-mails and physical documents. There were hardly any face-to-face interactions or daily stand-up meetings. Most of the information sharing took place through e-mails and physical documents. ScrumMaster monitored the R&D Project. The Business Analysts extracted knowledge about requirements from customers and handed them to the developers. Developers translated the information into executable codes. Then, testers wrote verification scripts to validate the results. There were huge communication gaps at every stage of this process resulting in difference in the original request and the final delivered product. Every team member was working in silos; however, the ScrumMaster had a full view of the project. Based on the scenario, list the changes that the Agile coach of Nutri Worldwide Inc. should implement to reduce the communication gap within the team. Listed are some of the recommended changes that could be introduced to help the team overcome the issues: • Ensure daily stand-up meetings are conducted at the same time and place. • Use minimal documentation, just enough to have audit trail of the requirement, and ensure most of the finer details emerge through face-to-face communication. • Use Kanban or Task boards to track the progress of the user stories. This ensures everyone is aware of each other’s progress. It also enables individuals to take pride in the stories that they have completed. • Use Burnup and Burndown charts in the work space to show the progress of the sprint and release. This helps the team to know their progress and assess whether they are behind or ahead of schedule. • Introduce video and audio conferencing facilities to the team, if it is not co-located. This ensures the team members are well connected to each other. Tony Orlando, the Executive Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Fairfax, was asked to report on the primary reason behind project failures. The reason cited was the contradictory goals of different stakeholders working on the same project. The given image depicts the main challenge faced by the team. The developer wants to write structured code. The Marketing, Sales, and Finance personnel want the product to succeed, while the customer demands a good user experience. There is little interaction between these stakeholders in an IT project, leading to differences in the goals of the business unit and the IT unit. Tony cited that the failure of new initiatives was due to the huge disconnect between business units, such as marketing, sales, and finance, and IT goals. It was out of these seemingly contradictory goals that the Agile development framework was born. Its principles are very important in business, today. In Agile, the focus shifts from the project to the product. Sufficient communication channels and iterations are required for the success of the organization. The given image shows the necessary communication channels and iterations.

Brainstorming session is a tool to generate ideas from a selected audience to solve a problem or stimulate creativity. It is important to create an environment that would encourage and facilitate a free flow of ideas. Brainstorming could also be used by the project teams for solving a process problem, inventing new products or product innovation, solving inter-group communication problems, improving customer service, budgeting exercises, and project scheduling.

Some of the steps to set up an effective brainstorming session are as follows. • Optimize the environment for brainstorming • Engage an experienced brainstorming facilitator • Provide background to the participants, ahead of time, so they can be prepared • Create a team with people from diverse groups • Conduct a creative warm-up activity, to lift the energy level prior to the meeting • Establish the ground rules for the session • Postpone criticism. This is very important, because criticism tends to interrupt the flow of ideas and will even block the ideas from coming forward.

There is no single prescription to make a brainstorming session successful, but the steps to conduct an effective brainstorming session are given on the screen: • Who wants to be the lead? Designate an individual to facilitate the session. This facilitator must ensure the philosophy is carried out appropriately to achieve the desired outcome of the meeting. • Ready, set, goal: The facilitator has to present a set of specific questions or goals to the group to generate ideas or feedback. • Got an idea? Share it: Each member has to write one idea per card and read it aloud to the group. Later, the card is placed in the middle of the table. • Put the puzzle together: After all the ideas are on the table, the group collectively and collaboratively arranges the cards on the table and determines the most critical ideas to pursue. It is very important that this is a group activity, and everyone gets to voice their opinion. • Solve it as a team: Now the group will form teams, which will work on the tasks to take the ideas forward after discussion. After discussion, the team will assign individual tasks, and reach a consensus on the desired course of action

An important metric used by the team in planning is “Velocity”. It helps forecast delivery timelines. Velocity is calculated by adding the number of story points assigned to each user story that the team has completed during the iteration. Key points to remember are as follows: Velocity is a reliable measure because it is based on empirical data, past observations, and not on somebody’s perception of the data. It is an observation of the team’s capacity to complete work per iteration and not an estimate or a target. Velocity is based on the team’s sizing of work items in reference to estimated time; not on the time dictated or imposed by anyone other than the team members. It is based on the team’s estimation and not the estimation done by some external entity such as customers or stakeholders. Velocity is comparable across iterations for a given team on a given project. The velocity of a team can only be compared with itself from iteration-to-iteration. The goal for the team should be to maintain a consistent velocity and not necessarily to maximize velocity. It is not comparable across teams or projects. The image on the screen depicts velocity trend across iterations, where the blue line indicates actual velocity.

If a team completes four stories in a given iteration, with story points A, B, C, and D as 5, 3, 7, and 5 respectively, calculate the velocity. Options are given on the screen, click the tabs to choose the right answer. • This is an incorrect option. • Good work! 20 is the correct option. Velocity can be calculated by adding the story points assigned to each user story. By adding the story points given here, velocity is 5+3+7+5 = 20.

If the velocity of the team is 14, identify the stories that will be earmarked for Iteration 1 and Iteration 2 during release planning? (Note: Story A has the highest priority followed by Story B and so on) Click the ‘Answer’ button to view the stories earmarked for Iterations 1 and 2. If the team knows its normal rate of velocity, it can use this information for planning the work. In this example, the team’s velocity is 14. The team can select stories to work on, in future iterations, based on the sizes of the stories. For instance, in iteration 1, the team can work on stories A, B, and C, which add up to a size of 14 (5 + 8 + 1). Another combination of stories can also be picked, such as C, D, F, and G, which adds up to a size of 14 (3 + 3 + 5 + 3). In collaboration with the product owner, the team can select the best possible combination.

Velocity measures the number of story points delivered during iteration. The unit of measure for velocity is determined during the estimation session. They are Story Points and Ideal Time. Story points are the unit of measure if the team plans to commit to user stories based on relative sizing. Ideal time is used as a unit of measure if the team plans to commit to user stories based on hours or days. Stories are the actual work items that determine the value of the story points. Ideal hours reflect the effort to implement the story points. Note the following points: • Only the completed work is counted towards velocity. • Velocity corrects estimation errors. • Velocity tracks customer satisfaction. • Velocity tracks early and continuous delivery.

The given bar chart shows a graph plotting the velocity of a team over 13 iterations. Notice that the velocity of the team varies largely between 25 and 45, with one outlier observation in iteration 1 and 7. Leaving the outliers, the average velocity of sprints is 38. Such historical data is useful for the team, as the average velocity from iterations will be used to compute the overall capacity of upcoming releases.

As Agile was started by software developers and it emphasizes on sharing, community, and high visibility, there are a large number of Agile tools available as open source products. Some of the open source Agile tools are: • Agile specific project management tools (Example: xplanner) • Continuous integration build tools (Example: Cruise Control) • Automated testing tools (Example: Junit, Fitnesse) • Agile software configuration management tools (Example: subversion)

Following is the quiz section to check your understanding of the lesson. Select the correct answer and click Submit to see the feedback.

Let us summarize the topics covered in this lesson: ? The renowned motivational theories used in Agile are: o Abraham Maslow's Hierarchy of Human Needs, o Frederick Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, o David McClelland’s Achievement Motivation Theory, and o Motivational Factors by Boehm. ? There are differences in co-located and distributed teams as well as tools and techniques that work well with both of them. ? Osmotic communication occurs when information is overheard in the background of the team room. ? Collaboration is the basis for bringing together the knowledge, experience, and skills of multiple team members to contribute to the development of a new product. It can happen synchronously or asynchronously. ? Brainstorming session is a tool to generate ideas from a selected audience to solve a problem or stimulate creativity. ? Velocity is a measure of team’s rate of progress per iteration. ? It is calculated by adding the number of story points assigned to each user story that the team has completed during the iteration. ? The unit of measure for velocity is determined by the team during the estimation session. ? The open source Agile tools available are: o Xplanner for Agile specific project management tools o Cruise Control for continuous integration build tools o Junit, Fitnesse for automated testing tools o Subversion for Agile software configuration management tools

This concludes Domain IV, Team Performance. The next domain is ‘Adaptive Planning.’