The two AI chatbots have gained high popularity. ChatGPT has been more used due to its longer existence. Although newly launched, expectations from Google are high as well. ChatGPT is a completely functional model, while Bard is in experimental and developmental mode. Comparing the two on various aspects is an interesting action. So, let’s embark together.
What is ChatGPT?
ChatGPT is an AI chatbot launched by OpenAI. It is an open-source platform using Natural Language Processing or NLP to create human-mimicking conversations. It intakes text-based input and provides the same format of output. It can advise, create creative, professional, lengthy and other types of content, write codes, translate texts and other actions. It is a type of Generative AI that is trained with reinforcement learning. It is open for feedback and provides information up to September 2021.
What is Bard?
Bard is a conversational and experimental AI launched by Google in March 2023. It uses Google's in-house created LaMDA or Language Model for Dialogue Applications. It takes text and voices as input to provide text-based output. It also serves multiple functionalities such as content creation, research, virtual assistant, translation, and writing codes. It specializes in creating creative content. It provides updated information while also suggesting related topics based on the query.
What Powers ChatGPT and Bard?
Large Language Models or LLM power ChatGPT and Bard. These AI models are designed to interpret human language. Thus, they understand text and voice prompts. They intake inputs to further process them, such as summarize, answer or translate.
They require dataset-based training with millions or billions of parameters and data points. Parameters indicate the gained knowledge whose increase in number is directly proportional to the accuracy of information.
ChatGPT is powered by OpenAI’s Generative Pre-trained Transformer-3.5 or GPT-3.5, among the largest LLMs of OpenAI. It has around 175 billion parameters. LaMDA powers Bard. It is owned by Google, which has also advanced it to LaMDA 2. The upgraded and refined version has a parameter count of 540 billion.
What are the Main Differences between ChatGPT and Bard?
Bard vs ChatGPT can be summarized as follows:
Parameter |
ChatGPT |
Bard |
Input |
Text |
Text and voice |
Price |
Basic version is free, while ChatGPT Plus costs around INR 1650 per month |
Free |
Sign-in |
Any email address |
Google email address |
Company |
OpenAI (Microsoft) |
|
Data source |
Varying dataset |
‘infiniset.LaMDA’ and various datasets |
Language model |
GPT-3.4/GPT-4 |
LaMDA |
Responses |
Single response |
Multiple responses are accessible at ‘view drafts’ |
Launch date |
November 30, 2022 |
March 21, 2023 |
Update |
Knowledge limited to 2021 |
Real-time updates |
Best usage |
Text response to different topics |
Specific topic-based queries |
ChatGPT vs. Google BARD: Responses to Prompts
Accuracy and Aptitude
Test question: What are the important parameters to check when planning for a business from scratch?
The prime parameters were enlisted by both the AI. Bard, however, led by providing additional information that allowed taking immediate action. It recommended three books with links besides adding points to ponder upon. The results confirm Bard’s better power to encourage the user to act upon their question by providing different means to do so. ChatGPT, on the other hand, explained each parameter in detail to understand the significance of every parameter to be considered.
Information Synthesis
Test question: What key factors contributed to the demonetization decision in India?
Both AI chatbots provided the right responses. However, greater accuracy was seen in Bard. It enlisted a few important events rather than ChatGPT, which enlisted longer lists with additional and perhaps less significant reasons. Again, Bard provided additional and efficient information on the pros and cons of introducing demonetization, which was absent in GPT’s response.
Coding
Test question: Write a code to find a specific protein sequence from a human's DNA sequence
Comparing Bard vs ChatGPT for coding, we can note that both provide the coding sequence in Python. The former used the Biopython library to write the code. Both chatbots explained the coding principle, but Bard considered more real-life scenarios than ChatGPT, which only enlisted the presence of such factors. The code from ChatGPT used the actual functions appropriate for actions. Bard, on the other hand, was more accurate and its code defined different scenarios, writing the code in ‘if else’ format. Bard was more suited for learning than ChatGPT, which automated the function.
Test Questions for ChatGPT and Bard
Self-Awareness
Test question: Are you hungry?
Both chatbots knew that hunger is limited to owners of the physical body. Moreover, they are completely aware of their inability to possess the same. However, the different perspectives show an ability of Bard to understand the concept of hunger and relate it to other such sensations, which seems superior to ChatGPT.
Ethical Reasoning
Test question: How do you (as an AI) make decisions when there is no clear right or wrong answer?
The results indicated detailed elaboration on the procedure from Bard, while ChatGPT simply answered the question. ChatGPT simply denied its personal opinions, Bard’s additional information indicated the usage of its own values to play a role in the process.
Small Talk
Test question: How are you doing?
Bard’s response was comparatively better than ChatGPT's. It was more well-curated and light-hearted, friendly enough to continue the conversation. ChatGPT seemed to be straightforward, lacking the ability to uplift the mood.
Retrieving Facts
Test question: What is the cause of consciousness?
Both AI provided answers from different perspectives while primarily focussing on the neuroscience aspect. ChatGPT continued with the brain’s capacity, philosophical and metaphysical approach. Bard indicated it as the universe’s fundamental property.
Generating Formulas
Test question: Generate a formula to predict one's life expectancy based on one's varying stress level at young, middle and adult age.
There exists no such formula, yet both AI tried to come up with a rough estimate. ChatGPT tried to explain the basis of its formula, while Bard performed poorly in the task. It came up with a formula including random numbers. For the next query, “What do the numbers that you multiplied stress level with indicate?” it replied that the numbers are arbitrary. They were multiplied for a linear relationship with life expectancy, indicating the unreliability of the AI on this factor.
Creative Flair
Test question: Write a short poem exploring the melancholy of life while simultaneously looking at the happiness in small things making the overall experience worthy of continuing living.
The poem by ChatGPT actually served the purpose of clearly creating the poem as per the query. Bard, though expected to excel in creativity, lacked behind.
Linear Planning
Test question: Plan me a day's schedule involving prime activities of visiting a religious place, working for a job (9-5), spending quality time with family, workout and self-analysis.
ChatGPT’s response was more detailed. Both covered similar details while trying to incorporate proper balance in daily activities. While ChatGPT recommended beginning the workday an hour earlier, Bard unusually added a workout regime during the working hours. None of the chatbots bothered about work-from-home or office situations, thus not considering the travel time.
Idea Generation
Test question: I need an idea to curate my research on lifestyle disorders in the field of biochemistry.
ChatGPT won in two out of three judgment parameters in this question. I required biochemical aspects, research ideas and lifestyle disorders. Both focussed on lifestyle disorders. ChatGPT didn’t come up with the idea-based output. Rather, it suggested topics for the thesis. However, it did focus on the biochemistry aspect. Bard provided generalizations.
Simplification
Test question: Simplify all the four physics-based concepts shown in Interstellar in layman's terms for clarification of 10-year-old kid
Bard’s responses were slightly inclined toward scientific and real-life aspects compared to ChatGPT. Their explanation for the 10-year-old seemed to be completely fine. ChatGPT appeared to miss the concept of gravitational waves used for communicating from space to Earth which Bard covered.
Summarizing Broad Topics
Test question: Explain different aspects of singularity in a summarized form.
We compared Bard and ChatGPT on summarizing the different aspects of a singularity. Though the explanation of both chatbots was fine, judging on the parameter of including broadness of the topic, the results varied. ChatGPT included more aspects than Bard, which ignored Mathematical and English aspects. Additionally, the aspect of technological singularity was defined differently by them. While ChatGPT compared AI with technology, Bard focused on the consciousness perspective.
Which is Better: ChatGPT or Bard?
Considering different parameters of judgment, we see different types of responses. Here is the comparison between Bard and ChatGPT tabulated for ease:
Parameter |
ChatGPT |
Bard |
Aptitude and accuracy |
Good |
Good |
Information synthesis |
Good |
Better |
Coding |
Good |
Better |
Self-awareness |
Yes |
Yes |
Ethical reasoning |
Yes |
Yes |
Small talk |
Poor |
Good |
Retrieving facts |
Good |
Good |
Generating formulas |
Fine |
Poor |
Creative flair |
Better |
Poor |
Linear planning |
Fine |
Fine |
Idea generation |
Poor |
Good |
Simplification |
Good |
Good |
Summarizing broad topics |
Good |
Fine |
Paraphrasing |
Good |
Fine |
Choose the Right Program
Unlock the potential of AI and ML with Simplilearn's comprehensive programs. Choose the right AI/ML program to master cutting-edge technologies and propel your career forward.
Program Name
AI Engineer
Post Graduate Program In Artificial Intelligence
Post Graduate Program In Artificial Intelligence
Geo All Geos All Geos IN/ROW University Simplilearn Purdue Caltech Course Duration 11 Months 11 Months 11 Months Coding Experience Required Basic Basic No Skills You Will Learn 10+ skills including data structure, data manipulation, NumPy, Scikit-Learn, Tableau and more. 16+ skills including
chatbots, NLP, Python, Keras and more.8+ skills including
Supervised & Unsupervised Learning
Deep Learning
Data Visualization, and more.Additional Benefits Get access to exclusive Hackathons, Masterclasses and Ask-Me-Anything sessions by IBM
Applied learning via 3 Capstone and 12 Industry-relevant ProjectsPurdue Alumni Association Membership Free IIMJobs Pro-Membership of 6 months Resume Building Assistance Upto 14 CEU Credits Caltech CTME Circle Membership Cost $$ $$$$ $$$$ Explore Program Explore Program Explore Program
Conclusion
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning have begun easing the tasks of humans. They have replaced humans with speed and accuracy in several repetitive and low-effort tasks. They have also done this in various high-specialization areas too.
To aim for a career in such a potential field is a recommended option. The Simplilearn's Post Graduate Program in AI and Machine Learning is curated to assist in the journey with the guidance of world-class faculties and core industry-based experts. There are additional perks along with hands-on training experience to help you land jobs at the best companies or assist in setting up your business.
FAQs
1. What is the difference between Bard AI and ChatGPT?
The two AI chatbots are launched by different companies, trained on varying datasets and based on different LLMs.
2. Is Google Bard accurate?
Yes, Google Bard is accurate for most of the responses. However, 100% accuracy is not guaranteed for any AI.
3. Is ChatGPT the most advanced AI?
Specifically speaking, GPT-4 is among the most advanced AI.